UPDATED: Boston City Councilor Chuck Turner endorsed state Sen. Dianne Wilkerson in her general election write-in campaign Tuesday night, strongly questioning challenger Sonia Chang-Diaz's race and ties to the Hispanic and black communities in the district.
Boston City Councilor Chuck Turner (Green-Rainbow-Roxbury)Turner, of Roxbury, also backed Wilkerson (D-Boston) in her primary against Chang-Diaz (D-Jamaica Plain). Chang-Diaz beat the state senator in that primary, but Turner said he is sticking with Wilkerson in the general election because she is a valuable advocate for the district.
"To have Ms. Chang-Diaz in the seat really takes away a treasured resource," Turner told PolitickerMA.com. His district, he said, "needs someone in the Senate that really understands what our needs are."
Turner said Suffolk County's 2nd Senate District was created so Boston's Hispanic and black populations would have adequate representation in the state Senate. Turner questioned Chang-Diaz's Latina heritage, saying that he heard that she added "Diaz" to her last name when she first considered running for public office.
Turner said the candidate's base of support comes from liberal white women. "I do know that her base and her chief fundraiser was Barbara Lee," he said. Several in Wilkerson's campaign, as well as the senator herself, have suggested that Lee unfairly influenced the race with her fundraising. Lee and the Chang-Diaz campaign have disputed that charge.
Turner said Chang-Diaz's base is "part of the national group that thought Barack Obama getting the [Democratic] nomination was depriving white women everywhere of something they deserved to have."
The councilor also said that Chang-Diaz has "no roots politically or socially or anything else in the Hispanic communities" in the district.
Deborah Shah, Chang-Diaz's campaign manager, responded Wednesday that Chang-Diaz does not see race as an issue in her campaign.
"We think it's unfortunate that some people are making this about race," Shah said. "[W]e don't think this race is about race...It's about bringing new leadership to the district."
Shah went on to say that members of the community, regardless of their background, face the same challenges.
"What [Chang-Diaz] hears from talking to people is concern about healthcare, public schools, the safety of our neighborhood, and the financial crisis. That's what most people talk to you about, whatever their color or ethnicity," she said.
Shah also said any questions surrounding Chang-Diaz's ethnicity are completely unfounded. "There is no question about her Latina heritage, which she is extremely proud of," Shah said.
Chang-Diaz did add "Diaz" to her name, Shah said, when her father, a Costa Rican immigrant, changed his name. "More recently, he decided to go back to his original name, and she decided to do the same in part to honor him," Shah said, adding that the change did not coincide with her run for public office.
Check out PolitickerMA.com's running list of who Wilkerson's primary supporters are backing in the general election here.
UPDATE, Wednesday, 4:05 P.M.: This article originally stated that Councilor Turner is a Democrat. That is not the case. He is a member of the Green-Rainbow Party, according to his office.
Former Gov. Mitt Romney (R) is scheduled to campaign for U.S. Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.) in Atlanta and Savannah on Friday. Chambliss faces >
To view a larger version of this cartoon, click here. >
So, Sonia Chang-Diaz will
So, Sonia Chang-Diaz will only be looking out for her constituents of -what- Hispanic or white origin, but not African Americans??
Does that follow, then, that Barack Obama will also only be looking out for the interests of African-American constituents?
I thought we'd gotten past some of this hogswallop.
Lieberman, redux
How disgusting, especially that Turner should invoke Obama while essentially race-baiting Chang-Diaz. Obama is the candidate who has strenuously run on the *issues*, not on his color. Equally disgusting that elected officials think that someone who has pled guilty to misdemeanor crimes should be *entitled* to a place in state government. I guess when you've lost any sense of accountability or serving the public, entitlement is all you have going for you.
Wilkerson is no better than Joe Lieberman. I hope she gets her a-- handed to her in the general and is out of politics for good.
Turner is not a Democrat
The caption beneath Chuck Turner's name incorrectly says he's a Democrat from Roxbury. He is not a Democrat, but rather a member of the Massachusetts Green-Rainbow Party.
campaign or race ?
you know. i can dig questioning Sonia's understanding of the needs of the district. i can dig questioning whether she can get the job done. i can dig the need for Roxbury and Dorchester (made up by a majority of Blacks and Latinos ) to have a strong advocate to address the disproportionate needs of our communities due to historic and institutionalized racism. and question her political roots but . . .
her social ties ? going by what you heard ? and most of all ?
Is this seat reserved for "coloreds" only ? Sounds a little racist to me. I mean Blacks can be racist right ? Honestly does she have to be Black ? Cuz I think what makes Senator Wilkerson a good senator is because she is extremely intelligent, has a good voting record, has a long list of advocacy and policy accomplishments over her tenure, because she is probably the most visible and vocal member of all the legislators representing neighborhoods comprised by a majority of people of color (which is where i live) in Boston. And she is Black but not because she is Black. I think the "race" card distracts voters from seeing the Senator's acumen and experience and further harms her efforts by leveling an accusation of racism at all of Sonia's supporters and even implies it about Senator Wilkerson's supporters. . .or maybe it's just me ?
Deborah Shah is Lying
Sonia's campaign manager is flat out lying when she says the name change "did not coincide with her run for public office," and OCPF records tell the story:
http://www.efs.cpf.state.ma.us/default.aspx
10/3/2005- "Sonia Chang" receives $63.50 reimbursement from Pat Jehlen campaign
11/15/2005- "Sonia Chang-Diaz" donates $50 to Sam Yoon campaign
Sorry, Chang-gang, this does definitely coincide with her run for public office. If fact, the Yoon donation could be considered the first public move of her losing 2006 campaign.
It's impossible to say with 100% certainty why Sonia changed her name (though the timing makes political reasons a very good guess), and it's debatable how much of an issue this really should be. However, having your flaks lie about the timing is pretty bad- especially for a pol who (in opposition to her opponent's many conspicuous problems) is presenting herself as ethical white knight for the district (pun intended).
Some enterprising reporter should dig into the verifiable timing of these claims...Why take the campaign's word for it?
From what I read it seems
From what I read it seems that the majority of the people in this district are black. Given that and Chang-Diaz won the primary would it be safe to assume that the majority of the black people in this district wanted a change from Wilkerson?
The voters have spoken. We'll see what happens when the general election comes around....all in all it sounds like sour grapes to me.
Good Luck Ms. Chang-Diaz.
Wrong assumption
No. Your assumption is incorrect for a number of reasons. First more whites voted for Diaz than blacks. The data already proves this point. Secondly, you would have to be able to say that the blacks that did vote, cast their vote for Diaz. We already know that this was not the case either. Additionally, we know that voter turnout was low on that night, so some of the people who backed Wilkerson just didnt show up that night. Last, even if it was the case that some blacks did not vote for Wilkerson, you couldnt assume it was because they wanted a change from Wilkerson. Maybe they are voting socialist or maybe they couldnt get out to vote at all. On a number of different levels, your case is weak and doesnt even demonstrate the slightest casual connection between change and voter action.
Post new comment